Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Non-member raj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Rohtang pass
    Posts
    2,595
    Post Thanks / Like

    camber

    just now, ive finished overhauling all the suspension parts.

    now after aligning the wheels by sight[temporary until i can get it done properly] ive noticed that there is abit of negative camber and ive had to adjust the track rods to show at least 6cm of thread until the wheels straightened.

    would 30/35mm lowering springs cause this.?
    my car is by no means slammed. and to be honest the ride height looks pretty much standard. i was under the impression that camber probs occur when you lower the car too much

  2. #2
    Non-member Brigsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Redcar
    Posts
    4,138
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    A bit of negative camber wont hurt it. Im not sure what the camber is on std rideheight but ill bet its nearer the -1deg.

    My van has -1.5 deg camber with 30mm springs, within the tolerance when i got the tracking done on a 4 wheel lazer alignment machine.

  3. #3
    Non-member Spooky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    SW PMT HQ
    Posts
    2,289
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    I'm in the same boat.

    On my previous car I dialled out a bit of the neg camber with some ott priced camber correction bolts. They actually worked quite well.

    Baring in mind I never actually had the camber properly adjusted, I think I found an ideal setup for me!

    On my current car, the neg camber is very obvious.

    I'm thinking about changing the top mounts/hubs/shocks for the PH1 setup, as I've seen numerous lowered PH1 GTTs with a reasonable amount of camber and not the extreme camber I currently have with the PH2 bits LOL

  4. #4
    Non-member tiff_lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Glasgow/Lincs
    Posts
    1,277
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    Why try and get rid of the negative camber surely it helps improve the handling? I remember having to pay a fair bit for negative camber bottom arms on my old mini.

    Although the most obvious reasons not to have it would be scrubbing off the inside of the tyres but is there any other reason not to on a R5?

  5. #5
    Honorary Member Guybrush's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Haslemere, Surrey
    Posts
    1,110
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    Quote Originally Posted by tiff_lee View Post
    Why try and get rid of the negative camber surely it helps improve the handling? I remember having to pay a fair bit for negative camber bottom arms on my old mini.

    Although the most obvious reasons not to have it would be scrubbing off the inside of the tyres but is there any other reason not to on a R5?
    not any good for 1/4 mile runs, and like you say... to much negative camber isn't good for the tyres.

  6. #6
    Non-member tiff_lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Glasgow/Lincs
    Posts
    1,277
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    Oh right of course as for sprints you would want maximum tyre to road contact?

  7. #7
    Non-member Spooky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    SW PMT HQ
    Posts
    2,289
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    Camber is good for turning in/corner entry etc

    Not so good for straight line grip as the tyre foot print is reduced and you'll increase tyre wear as already stated.

    I only fiddled with mine to find the setup I was happiest with and that involved dialling out the amount of camber I'd achieved simply by lowering my car.

  8. #8
    Non-member raj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Rohtang pass
    Posts
    2,595
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    Quote Originally Posted by tiff_lee View Post
    Oh right of course as for sprints you would want maximum tyre to road contact?
    id want maximum tyre contact at all times. im not keen on the car being skittish.

  9. #9
    Honorary Member Guybrush's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Haslemere, Surrey
    Posts
    1,110
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    Quote Originally Posted by Spooky View Post
    Camber is good for turning in/corner entry etc

    Not so good for straight line grip as the tyre foot print is reduced and you'll increase tyre wear as already stated.

    I only fiddled with mine to find the setup I was happiest with and that involved dialling out the amount of camber I'd achieved simply by lowering my car.
    Hang on Sukhi, lowering his car surely not


    Quote Originally Posted by raj View Post
    id want maximum tyre contact at all times. im not keen on the car being skittish.
    Having negative camber is a good thing for cornering, as the weight shifts to the wheels which have more contact with the road.... (i'm sure i can think of a better way of explaining that but i've had too much rum now )

  10. #10
    Non-member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Guernsey, UK
    Posts
    32
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: camber

    New poster! (less than 10 posts)

    Quote Originally Posted by raj View Post
    id want maximum tyre contact at all times. im not keen on the car being skittish.
    Unfortunately you can't have maximum tyre contact at all times, it's always going to be a compromise. You definitely don't want to run 0 degrees camber for road use, you'll get a nasty surprise the first time you corner in the wet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •