what the odds are my raider was Date of First Registration 20 04 1990 which is also my birthday as well being 20/04/78 how cool is that
what the odds are my raider was Date of First Registration 20 04 1990 which is also my birthday as well being 20/04/78 how cool is that
any one been on pistonheads to night put a link
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/t...161&i=0&nmt=RE: SOTW: Renault 5 GT Turbo&mid=125161
found my certificate the other day same as yours has the blue in the corner and everything cant get a pix up tho as my camera is broke
Seriously, if you have a certifcate and a letter to say your car is number 53 why dont you scan it/photo it....
chris post up your oval plate number . we can tell you were it was built and pos wich month it was built
i didnt jesus in the seat of a 5 did if you look back at the start i didnt say anything about it matt did ok
i no what month and it was Canterbury kent dealer ship that sold it if thats what you mean
wouldnt it be more like 730 to 1?
Nope ........the odds are 365-1 for both events ... the combination of the two where's that JRP fella at when you need him
What are the odds of that piece of paper with number 53 turning up ? now that's the real question
I think you're trying to calculate the probability of both events happening on a specific date, but he asked what the odds were on his car having been registered on the same date as his birthdate, which is a constant, so the odds are 365-1.
If he had asked what the probability was of him picking a random date that was both a match for his birthdate and for his car's date of registration then that would have been significantly higher at 133225-1
Have I just made myself favourite for winning "RTOC: sad cnut of the week" ? Probably
Thanks
Don't sell yourself short .....the year is almost over and it'll take some beating that
Rtoc sad cnut of the year ! It goes to show, anything is possible if you practice hard enough
pretty with my calculations. but hats off to the sad cnut of the year
I vanish for a while.. come back and more utter gold has been posted... will it ever stop... i hope not for all our sake... not LOL
Have I just made myself favourite for winning "RTOC: sad cnut of the week" ? Probably
Shouldn't it be 366 - 1? I'm pretty sure it was a leap year
nope,lol.
http://kalender-365.de/leap-years.php
whats this every one
about they wornant numbered
No, the silver one was B9 GTT. B5 GTT was THE GT Tuning demo car that was the 1/4 mile record holder for several years. It was originally a Raider (Number 1 I believe - There's a piece of A4 paper confirming it ),
right so renault tell me you can find out which number your raider is by give them your chassie number and when i bought the car the the guy i bought the car from confirms this as well i cant be the only one with this info or be the only one with the paper work from brand new
im going to trace the buyer from new to see what he says about this some guy a jame alan coleman or does anybody no of this guy ??
he lived in crowborough kent
Round and round in circles we go
I'm personally getting abit bored of this 'Raiders being numbered' crap, i personally don't really care if there numbered or not as to be honest it doesn't make them any more valuable or desirable if it did. I just like to see this confirmed so we can all get on with it.
I personally don't think they were, why? for pure fact i've seem at least 20 Raiders in my time with 5's, some owned by friends, members and one being my cousins which he bought as a 2yr old car. He got no paperwork, no number as did non of the other Raiders either. If they were i would have thought a number would have been put in there on a small plaque like the Clio Williams
Chris (Raider gtt), if you do have abit of paperwork then please show it, it means we've all learnt something that a hell of alot of people didn't know.
Also J-reg Raiders being fakes, don't think so. I've seen 2, 1 i've personally been in and they are genuine Raiders not copies.