djinuk
21-09-2009, 22:26
**** ok ive copied the following of the 106 owners club as i think the guy i brought the car off may be on there, however i though i would post it on here for you lot to see*****
Ok, today i brought a 1.4 106 quicksilver for my girlfriend from autotrader. The car came from a lad who may or once was on here. I brought it based on him telling me the temp sensor had failed causing the gauge to go straight to max (which indeed was the case), however he assured me the car was fine and he had been driving it like it with no problems. No mayo in the oil etc no signs of hg failure. The advert also stated the car had had the thermostat replaced (odd thing to state in a advert). Anyway after purchasing the car as mechanically fine etc we traveled a few miles before we had an ocasional missfire, a few more miles and the hg failed. The rac recovered us and im told the thermostat had failed causing it to overheat, he also mentioned the thermostat was ancient and had not been changed recently at all.
I text the lad stating i was sat on the m42 waiting for recoevery due to blown headgasket... he has yet to reply... for now i will give him the benefit of the doubt and i hope he responds and await the explanation.
Very gutted , pissed off, feel bad upon my girlfriend who was relying on this to get her to work tomorrow. Also we have a HG bill awaiting.
I hope the guy gets in contact and that there is a genuine reason for him not doing so already.
Sorry for the rant folks
***************
post 2
he car was owned by a young lad.. 18 to be sure, so not in the trade etc, however he did not get me to sign a sold as seen receipt, simply because i was not buying the car as scene , i was buying as described by himself and the advert.
the lad did not get back in touch (nice to see his concern of his mechanically sound car blowing a headgasket after 10 mins ...hey) however this afternoon he answered his phone..
He states he does not believe himself to be liable in anyway, however I have a garage who are looking at the car who are willing to enter a engineers report in the matter as they believe the hg was already gone and there it was covered up as stated previously, the oil was fresh and the oil filter was brand spanking new. I believe with this report aswell as the proof of RAC recovery and rac diagnosis (the guy really new what he was on about) i will stand good ground should it come to it to take matters further.
Cheers for your concern in this matter guys, its a shame we now live in a world whereby nobody can be trusted.
The lad actually was angry as my text woke him up (the txt 10 mins after leaving his house) (at approx 3:30).
Ok, today i brought a 1.4 106 quicksilver for my girlfriend from autotrader. The car came from a lad who may or once was on here. I brought it based on him telling me the temp sensor had failed causing the gauge to go straight to max (which indeed was the case), however he assured me the car was fine and he had been driving it like it with no problems. No mayo in the oil etc no signs of hg failure. The advert also stated the car had had the thermostat replaced (odd thing to state in a advert). Anyway after purchasing the car as mechanically fine etc we traveled a few miles before we had an ocasional missfire, a few more miles and the hg failed. The rac recovered us and im told the thermostat had failed causing it to overheat, he also mentioned the thermostat was ancient and had not been changed recently at all.
I text the lad stating i was sat on the m42 waiting for recoevery due to blown headgasket... he has yet to reply... for now i will give him the benefit of the doubt and i hope he responds and await the explanation.
Very gutted , pissed off, feel bad upon my girlfriend who was relying on this to get her to work tomorrow. Also we have a HG bill awaiting.
I hope the guy gets in contact and that there is a genuine reason for him not doing so already.
Sorry for the rant folks
***************
post 2
he car was owned by a young lad.. 18 to be sure, so not in the trade etc, however he did not get me to sign a sold as seen receipt, simply because i was not buying the car as scene , i was buying as described by himself and the advert.
the lad did not get back in touch (nice to see his concern of his mechanically sound car blowing a headgasket after 10 mins ...hey) however this afternoon he answered his phone..
He states he does not believe himself to be liable in anyway, however I have a garage who are looking at the car who are willing to enter a engineers report in the matter as they believe the hg was already gone and there it was covered up as stated previously, the oil was fresh and the oil filter was brand spanking new. I believe with this report aswell as the proof of RAC recovery and rac diagnosis (the guy really new what he was on about) i will stand good ground should it come to it to take matters further.
Cheers for your concern in this matter guys, its a shame we now live in a world whereby nobody can be trusted.
The lad actually was angry as my text woke him up (the txt 10 mins after leaving his house) (at approx 3:30).